|
|
Advertiser Members
can learn of confidential audit findings through either direct
participation in the MRC process or dialogue with Agency members.
|
|
|
·
MRC Confidentiality
regulations prevent Agencies from sharing audit finding with non-MRC
members |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisers and their
Agency partners who both participate in the MRC can work together to
formulate buyer oriented strategies on important measurement issues. |
|
|
·
Formulate priorities for
proposed research improvement initiatives |
|
|
·
Assess alternative
measurement solutions (e.g. Zero Cell Model) |
|
|
·
Help guide more relevant
solutions |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertiser Members
can request that their Agency partner represent their position in MRC
meetings. |
|
|
·
Agency Members can be
officially recognized as representing a specific Advertiser |
|
|
·
Agency Members can be a
designated proxy on important voting matters |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertiser Members
may gain important insights on methods that are transported beyond
traditional audience measurement research. |
|
|
·
Arbitron PPM device
utilized in Project Apollo |
|
|
·
Telephone
Center Operations employed for Custom Research |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisers obtain
knowledge of audience measurement issues from an independent source. |
|
|
·
Enhance understanding of
measurement limitations impacting media plan performance (e.g. Audience
variability, Zero Cell) |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisers may be
more willing to support improvement initiatives. |
|
|
·
A greater understanding
of the issues may foster enhanced financial commitment |